Voice of Customer Data

Building AI-powered customer insights platform from ideation to launch.

About Voice of Customer for Gorgias

Gorgias combines conversational AI with sales and support skills, allowing e-commerce brands to personalize interactions with their customer base.

While conducting user interviews to surface key frustrations of our enterprise customers, we discovered a potential gap that could help our customer experience (CX) teams and their cross-functional partners extract actionable insights.

We understood that Gorgias tickets gave the ability to aggregate help desk tickets, and allow a deep-dive into precious data, but the current methods were very manual and reactive. How might we slash the manual reporting and surface valuable insights to our CX teams?

Team: Product Designer (Self), Product Manager, Engineering Manager, 6 Engineers

Timeline: Q2 2025 (initial design), Q3 2025 (Beta iterations & GA rollout)

Tools: Figma, Notion, User Testing, Product Market Fit Interviews, AI Intent Topics, Shopify

The Problem

Gorgias ticket and customer information provides valuable insights for our CX teams. However, the teams must manually and slowly aggregate the insights to report to cross functional teams. This leads to a reported 8-16 hours of additional workload monthly to review the data and react to major customer concerns.

As CX roles continue to morph in the presence of AI, how might we grow the CX role and help their cross-functional partners (Product, E-commerce, Logistics, Marketing, and Leadership) extract these insights leveraging AI, and shorten the issue detection periods to 1-2 days?

Key Points

  • 😵‍💫 Time-consuming manual ticket tagging & analysis process

    • CX managers spend additional 8-16 hours monthly, which is error-prone and laborious. Extracting insight often requires heavy spreadsheet work, pivot tables, and aggregating feedback from hundreds of tickets and reviews.

  • 🔗 Difficult to link actionable insights to key topics

    • Teams struggle to correlate feedback to the key topic, whether it's product issues, brand perception, logistics delays, or promotion performance.

  • 🐌 Delayed issue detection damage brand and customer satisfaction

    • Trends (e.g., product defects, logistics delays) are often discovered after the insights are presented to key teams, often about a month after customers have repeatedly raised the issue. By the time a pattern is noticed, customer dissatisfaction may already be widespread, affecting retention and brand reputation.

  • 🗣️ Cross-functional communication struggle

    • Preparing a comprehensive VoC report for other teams (Product, Marketing, Logistics, Leadership) requires merging data from multiple sources and reconciling different tagging conventions.

  • ⛓️‍💥 Fragmentation customer feedback across different channels

    • Feedback is combined from multiple channels (tickets, surveys, review platforms, and social media) with no unified view, and CX Managers must manually compile data from multiple platforms, making it difficult to see overall trends quickly.

I just had like a really difficult call with our quality team where I was like, hey guys, we are tracking so many quality tickets that we have like a thousand tags. I need to get rid of them. And they’re like, well, if you remove them, how are we gonna see like every single quality issue that comes through?
— Melinda - CX Manager

The Goal

Design the vision of a scalable, AI-powered Voice of Customer reporting experience by understanding current feedback workflows of our enterprise customers, identifying key insight needs, and aligning use cases across cross-functional teams, and a beta product to launch a product market fit test by the next quarter.

Discovery and Analysis

User Interviews & Testing Designs

To dive deeper into our customer needs, we conducted multiple types of interviews: general discovery, MVP design testing, and design vision with product-market fit. Out of these interviews, in tandem with competitive research and syncing across multiple teams to understand our AI capabilities, we were able to narrow down key insights:

Writing out personas and problem statements

Ideation presentation to leadership for feedback

Discovery

Splitting up dependancies into categories of when it may be usable based on roadmap-> OK for MVP, Post MVP, or not feasible

I gave myself the responsibility to report on customer feedback, it wasn’t asked by my leadership team. It’s been a great way to shine the spotlight on my team and what we can do for the company, as I see our roles slowly changing with the introduction of AI .
— I.T
I manually export all the tickets per month and dump them into a document. I like to take quote snippets to help the company leaders gain empathy with our customers, but this takes so much time out of my day.
— S.P

Insight Summary

🏷️ Current VoC reports built by merchants rely on Gorgias Ticket Fields

  • CX teams often rely on their agents to personally tags or ticket fields to categorize issues that may be happening. However, there is a high risk of error to tagging the right categories the higher the ticket count grows.

⏰ There is a lack of real-time or proactive issue identification due to the manual analysis

  • Summarizing this feedback involves heavy spreadsheet work and going through hundreds of tickets. Issue detective relies on this very long process, and issue detection is reactive.

🗣️ Increased value with cross-functional communication & insights from CX teams

  • As critical insights are shared with different teams, the CX team becomes more influential, and could foster a company wide focus on CX and their value.

🚫 Currently, there is fragmentation of data and siloed feedback across multiple teams

  • If we can bring together all the feedback from diverse channels (tickets, emails, surveys, social media, and review platforms), we can create a unified view and improve the quality of VoC insights.

Reviewing designs and ideation with AI and ML engineering teams to understand feasibility and break down dependancies

We don’t have a systematic way to analyze feedback- we usually have weekly meetings and rely on agents to raise their issues. I then have to take a few hours weekly to read through tickets and understand the problems myself.
— M.D
We currently have agents tag tickets with problems to look for a trend. However, tagging is not always perfect and mistakes hapen often. We have Trustpilot for feedback collection but again, we manually need to take time to review it. Our leadership is always looking for numbers behind our flagged issues.
— M.B

Customer Quotes

Vision Ideation

Creating a North Star Vision vs MVP

While working out the logistics and capabilities with engineering for MVP, I moved forward with building a north star future vision for 2027 for leadership and teams to understand how this product could impact our users. Leadership at the time of this project had never seen a vision more than 6 months in advance, and this was a great time to trial the impact that design could have in a company. The aim was to define and align the broader business goals and show a clear narrative of decision-making that could happen using Ai- driven data insights.

Creating a 2027 persona, user journey, and problem statements based off our customer interviews, allowed us to garner empathy across teams, and show how we could create a product market fit.

Click around Figma to look closer

🌟North Star Problem Statement🌟

CX teams and their cross-functional partners struggle to extract timely, accurate, and actionable insights from customer feedback. How might we aggregate available data into one platform (CDP), and allow CX teams to present insightful values as the role of CX members continue to change?

Creating our Product Persona

As the Voice of Customer project lines blurred into other team domains, it became clear that we needed the designers and leadership to align on the envisioned 2027 persona that we were working for, along with the main business goals. This way, each team could work confidently on their part to build towards the future together. The below was proposed to leadership with design members on how the CRM teams would work together, proposing a Voice of Customer, Customer Data Platform, Customer Profile, and Helpdesk Workspace product, symbiotic to each other.

Understanding the Jobs to be Done of the two final personas

Growth Marketing Manger vs Customer Success Lead

As discussions continued, we started mapping out what a Growth Marketing Manager or CX Lead would do in the current year, and what the job might entail in the future. Writing out the jobs to be done and the success metrics, and where the role might fall in the future ideated product of Gorgias was presented to VPs of product and design for feedback.

💡 Future 2027 CX Managers:


In a world where data analysis is highly automated:

- CX manager’s role shifts from manual analysis to strategic decision making and action-oriented execution.

- Jobs to be done will evolve to focus more on interpreting insights, driving cross-functional action, and influence business decisions instead of data aggregation.

Our future persona: A CX Manager with a shifted focus

Ideating with Technical Constraints for MVP

While working out the logistics and capabilities with engineering for MVP, I moved forward with building a north star future vision for 2027 for leadership and teams to understand how this product could impact our users. Leadership at the time of this project had never seen a vision more than 6 months in advance, and this was a great time to trial the impact that design could have in a company. The aim was to define and align the broader business goals and show a clear narrative of decision-making that could happen using Ai- driven data insights.

Creating a 2027 persona, user journey, and problem statements based off our customer interviews, allowed us to garner empathy across teams, and show how we could create a product market fit.

MVP Designs: Focused on delivering quick, actionable insights based on the data Gorgias is able to store in their tags and ticket fields: AI is able to summarize ticket contents into categories, give a brief summary (L1, L2, and L3 intents), and fit the contents into Positive and Negative intent categories.

🧐 How might we deliver quick and actionable insights based on data Gorgias is able to store?

👉 What details can using Intents in multiple levels (L1:L2:L3) bring to the user?

🗣️ How can we fit sentiment categories to tickets? ( Menacing, Threatening, Human Agent, Negative, Offensive, Positive, Promoter and Urgent), and sort them into two categories of Positive vs Negative for our users?

Challenges and Learnings

Challenges and Learning Points

  • Seeing the power of vision work and how design can be leveraged with teammates and leadership was very rewarding. The team was excited to work on what would come, and understood the user pain points and what we were trying to solve.

  • MVP was a good first step, and working through the product market fit testing was filled with growing pains. From what originally was pitched as a extra feature turned into the possibility of building out a Tiger Team to test and build vision in the near future.

  • Although the team started off nervous as not being experts in AI, we were able to learn together and explore the abilities of what is able to be done. 

👋 Thanks for scrolling through!